I'm not sure what Mr. Holland is seeking to find. It's nowhere in the motion what exactly he thinks is possibly a deficiency. Obviously, folks who are much more qualified than we are undertook this investigation, and if it is the fact that he didn't get the answer that he wanted, that may be something of a different discussion.
We've all had the opportunity to read the report. We've all had the opportunity to see what was found there. He hasn't brought anything specifically that he's looking for.
So I'm not sure. Certainly I'm not in favour until we find there's some major deficiency. I just don't see why we're going to spend the committee's time reviewing somebody else's work that was very competently done.