Definitely, and with permission, I will use two examples.
The first example is GENS. I want to be very clear: GENS will not commit $1 billion of government funds up front, where we go to Treasury Board to receive authorization to spend it right away. GENS is going to start small, with HRSDC. It's going to set the marker for more departments to come on board if the GENS results give us those price and performance markers, which we don't really have until we test the market.
I will refer to the second aspect in terms of my example about sizeable chunks and how we mitigate that. I have a lot of admiration for my colleague, Madame Renée Jolicoeur. We have worked together for many years, and we have learned the hard way sometimes. The pension modernization project, as an example, has been broken into multiple releases, and I believe we are in our fourth or fifth release right now. It's in production and it's on time. It is a large, complex project. It has been managed in chewable releases of software pieces, which so far is hitting the mark in terms of making sure we have checkpoints before we go to bigger commitments.