I think you are alluding to a concern expressed earlier.
First, it is often difficult to measure the gap between the commitment to a project, achieving an investment objective proposed to us, and carrying out the project, getting it started on the ground. What we are interested in are concrete projects that are actually in action. In addition, speeding up these projects and the capacity to complete them in the time allowed by the program are constant concerns for us.
We must not compromise the quality of what we are doing for program purposes, that is, the two-year deadline. That concern must be central to what we do. No matter how large or small our communities, the support that is needed for carrying out high-quality programs must be constantly taken into consideration. Certainly that is not equal everywhere.