I want you to clarify one other thing. You mentioned that sometimes, when you look at a consolidated budget, where you combine operating expenses and capital, capital becomes a poor stepchild. You look at the operating expenses and fund those first, because they're more immediate, and then capital tends to be brought to the side.
I would argue that in many cases, particularly in the area of infrastructure, municipal infrastructure, for example, you tend to let things go, and at some point in the future, when the infrastructure is about to collapse, you have to make massive investments. Would that accurately encapsulate what you were trying to get through to us?