I noticed in your 2012-13 report on plans and priorities—and this keeps coming up in your reports—that on page 8 you talk about the role of Public Works in implementing the federal sustainable development strategy, part of which is greening government buildings. That effort is commendable, and our committee is looking forward to delving into that in greater detail a little later on.
One thing that puzzles me is that PCO has established its corporate management advisory committee to which departments can come and explain both the fiscal side of what they're doing and the legislative and policy implementation, but there have been some concerns in the audits of PCO that departments are not bringing in sufficiently detailed information about things, including costing.
I'm wondering if you could outline—and perhaps that's part of the problem—why your reports show no savings to the deficit resulting from a move to retrofit and make government buildings and facilities more energy efficient.