Just to correct the record, Mr. Chair, I've been informed by my colleagues it was 2006, not 2007.
Moving forward, the fairness monitor identified a potential fairness issue concerning the reduction in the transition period that was set out in the RFI, from six months to three months. In response, a ramp-up period of three months was introduced, which, when you add the three-month transition period, resulted in the effective restoration of a six-month window for a contractor to attain the capability required to meet the total estimated workload.
Can you also explain why the contracts would include a change in provision of an adequate transition period?