The documents were ordered to be produced unredacted. The committee agreed to review them in camera and then follow the practice that we have used in the past to ensure that redactions that the committee agrees on are made before they are published.
It's possible that some things they're redacting are things on which we'll agree, such as personal information or people's phone numbers or names. Things that aren't germane to the public interest may end up being redacted, but that's not what the committee ordered. It was not for McKinsey to redact them or for their clients to say what's going to be redacted. They need to produce the documents.
I would just say the least aggressive response is for the committee—the chair or the clerk—to send the instruction that you've indicated you would be prepared to send. It doesn't require a further motion. It's not an admonishment. It's not a question of privilege. It is just saying that this is what's expected of you because this is what's required of you. I think that's a pretty low bar.