Evidence of meeting #3 for Health in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was million.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Morris Rosenberg  Deputy Minister, Department of Health
Robert Clarke  Assistant Deputy Minister, Infectious Disease and Emergency Preparedness Branch, Office of the Deputy Chief Public Health Officer, Public Health Agency of Canada
Jane Billings  Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Strategic Policy, Communications and Corporate Services Branch, Assistant Deputy Minister's Office, Public Health Agency of Canada
Clerk of the Committee  Mrs. Carmen DePape

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Agreed, but I would like to get a complete answer.

10:50 a.m.

Bloc

Christiane Gagnon Bloc Québec, QC

Thank you.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joy Smith

Thank you.

Madam Kadis.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

Minister, the residents of my riding of Thornhill are very concerned—as was also said by Ms. Davidson—about the use of pesticides, particularly on our food. In the last session many of us raised the issue at this committee of reports on the amount of pesticide residue permitted on fruits and vegetables--that it may be increased as part of the SPP.

My concern as well is that any of the $3.4 million that's being increased for our pest management control will be used in any way to increase the maximum residue of pesticides on our food.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

I can only reiterate to you and the committee that all pesticides in this country are stringently regulated. That has been the case, is the case, and will be the case. No changes to regulations will occur if they affect the health and safety of Canadians. That must be our top priority.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

So Canadians will not see a lowering of our standards as part of the harmonization.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Unlike some people, I need to have regard for science. If the scientists tell me that something is safe and does not impede Canadians' health, that's what I have regard for. I know you have constituents; I have constituents too. But at the end of the day we have to be ruled by fact rather than emotion.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

So you can't confirm today that we won't lower our standards on the amount of pesticide residue allowable on our foods.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

We will make evidence-based decisions that will protect the health and safety of Canadians. That's my commitment.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

I just want to make sure, and I think everyone wants to make sure, that we do not lower our standards.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

We will not lower our standards.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

There's too much pesticide in our food now.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Now you're into opinion rather than fact.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

That is what I'm hearing from my residents. I'm sure many others are too.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

I know you are. But I'm in a science-based department, and I have to rule on these things based on science.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

Then what you're saying is we're going to have to very closely monitor this issue for the health and safety of Canadians and perhaps have the minister back and those involved directly in the SPP discussions revolving around pesticides on our food.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

I don't know what discussions you are referring to, but I know there have been a lot of conspiracy theories engendered by the Liberal opposition.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

We had officials here in the last session. There was legitimate concern, and we had officials here, and I believe this bears--

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

We have MRL discussions. We do, and I'm not denying we do.

10:50 a.m.

Liberal

Susan Kadis Liberal Thornhill, ON

--close monitoring. I haven't heard definitively from you that we will not lower our standards on the pesticide residue level on our foods.

Thank you.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

You know, this is silly. That's just partisanship. I'm sorry you're reacting that way. I know a lot about health, Madam.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joy Smith

Are you finished, Madam Kadis?

Okay, Mr. Fletcher.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Steven Fletcher Conservative Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia, MB

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Minister, this government has done a lot in the area of heart disease, cancer, and mental health. You've talked about mental health already, but we haven't heard yet today about the progress in the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. I wonder if you could provide the committee with an update on that very great initiative.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

I think that's important. Obviously it's one of our signature initiatives as a government. Cancer is a national epidemic. The previous government ignored this fact and stonewalled against working together with cancer agencies, provinces, and territories for a national cancer strategy. We moved ahead. I was very proud of the Prime Minister when he announced in Montreal the establishment of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. It is not a top-down approach. Everyone is at the table, similar to what we have here. Everyone—provinces, territories, cancer survivors, oncologists, researchers, cancer agency individuals, and federal government representatives--is at the same table so that we can develop a national strategy.

Obviously the provinces must continue to play their role. Where the federal government fits in is on establishing better national surveillance, sharing of best practices, health human resources—which has been an issue at this committee today—and establishing better strategies for health human resources in the cancer area. These are all ways that we can be helpful through establishing the table and sharing the best practices.

It defies imagination, but it is true that some parts of our country and some provinces have some really good ideas that somehow never get transposed to other parts of the country. So some parts of the country get left behind in certain areas. This is our opportunity to share best practices and to deliver, I think, better cancer treatment, better cancer research, and better cancer prevention ultimately.

The experts tell us that if we adopt this strategy, we will be able to prevent something like 431,000 cases of cancer that would be deadly from being deadly, and that there are literally hundreds of thousands of other Canadians that would not get cancer in the first place if we follow this approach. I think this holds great hope that we can do better on the cancer front than we have been able to do in the past.

10:55 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joy Smith

Thank you, Mr. Minister.

Thank you, Ms. Wasylycia-Leis, for reducing your time so we can finish on time. You're next.