Thank you very much, Chairperson.
I think what hasn't been answered is why this motion is coming at this particular moment, in the middle of a presentation.
I think there's an appropriate place to have a motion and to have discussion about this. We haven't even finalized the list of witnesses yet, so we don't even know how many witnesses are going to be heard, which could be then an argument as to whether or not the number of meetings that have been established is sufficient to hear those witnesses, or whether we need additional hearings. That's my issue. I'm not going to get into whether something is being rammed through, or how political it is, but it seems just so strange that in the middle of a witness presenting you would try to foist this motion on the committee, when there's clearly a place on the agenda that is appropriate for doing it.
Here we are, now debating this, when we should be hearing the witness, as the agenda says. I would suggest we return to our agenda, because it says we're to hear from Monsieur Nadeau.