I quickly realized that I was rejoicing too soon because, in fact, you are opposed to the bill. I gathered you would come here today and explain why you are against it.
I'm sure the Conseil du patronat has members who carry out research and development. In a lab, however, projects are directed on the basis of experience. In Quebec, I would have thought that 30 years of anti-scab legislation makes for a darn good laboratory.
The unions have described real labour conflicts to us this morning where, without anti-scab legislation, replacement workers were used, I would have hoped that you would have given examples to back up your remarks. I'm still waiting.
I'd like you to answer my question without being overly theoretical, even though you do a good job at this. What concrete experiences have your affiliates had in Quebec which would suggest that anti-strike breaker legislation had an impact on the economy and on employment, and led to the dramatic incidents which occurred before the adoption of anti-scab legislation?