That's interesting. I'm not sure what the rationale is for that. Again, I think we determined last time, or there seemed to be some agreement then, that it was a completely unfair allocation of time.
It seems to me that in fairness, as we go through this process, we should have the time corresponding as closely as possible to the number of members we have in the House or in committee. Obviously the last time around we had a situation where we had the NDP member, one of 30 members in the House, getting to ask two questions before two Conservative MPs, out of the four sitting at the table, out of 125 or 126 members in the House that seem to be increasing on a fairly regular basis.
It seems there's definitely a fundamental unfairness. Obviously I don't think we'll be able to have a vote on this until we get this resolved, because we're simply not going to go for two rounds of four questions; we're not going to go for a 25% ratio, as we did last time. It's just not going to happen.