Just to state that it's my understanding that the nominations to the board will be on the advice of the employer and worker commissioners as part of a group of three, with somebody from the government, right? I think there's one person from the government. So I think it anticipates a sort of consultative process around those appointments. But we really don't know how that is going to proceed, and I think that's going to be an issue--whether the board is going to be representative of the constituencies or just a very narrowly technical board.
As my colleague here said, it's probably important that it is a representative board with some expertise around the issues, but then, technical skills can be paid for. The functions really are very narrow, if you think about it. My understanding is that because it's a crown corporation, when it invests, all it can invest in is interest-bearing assets. All you're really deciding is whether you buy Ontario bonds or Saskatchewan bonds, or whatever. It doesn't require deep layers of financial expertise. To the extent that it's not really about running the EI program, it doesn't need any particular expertise on EI issues. And as I said before, their economic assumptions come from the Department of Finance, so probably any economic expertise might be a liability.
So I think the issue of representativeness is probably important.