Our speaking time is limited, and I would like to hear your thoughts on another aspect before the end of our work here.
The appointment of arbitrators is political; this is the minister's responsibility and that is fine. However, we are aware that certain arbitrators are very good and others are not. Witnesses who have appeared here have said that they would go so far as to question the cognitive faculties of one particular person to do the work.
Do you have a mechanism to assess the competence of the heads of boards of referees, to see whether they can discharge their duties properly?