I guess what I'm sort of moving toward is that the success is fairly modest. When you're dealing with numbers in any department there's usually a million or billion attached to the end. I thought it was neat that you identified in your remarks that you went from three applications to 50 applications and that was by getting somebody out. There's a cost in achieving that success too in rural communities and it has been indicated before. Success in rural communities does have a greater cost factor. Could you give us an indication as to what types of increased costs we would have looked at and assumed you wouldn't be able to get that out?
On November 29th, 2011. See this statement in context.