Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Although I don't have the amendment in front of me, my understanding is that this is an attempt to replicate the formula that has already been used by having more than one minister appear at a time. I've had to make choices about the issues I wanted to raise and the ministers I wanted to question.
I am rather of the opinion that we should maintain the idea of hearing from the ministers separately. However, two hours may be too much, given our schedule. We have to think about how much time we have left between now and June. The committee will have other bills to study. We have a lot of motions to consider. A meeting will actually be held on the topic tomorrow.
In summary, the meeting with the ministers is important, especially before a budget is tabled. However, two hours each may be too long. We could ask them to appear separately, for one hour each.
Am I proposing a subamendment?