Thank you for the question. Let me deal with the second part first and come back to the harm.
On the guidelines, they'll come out as soon as this passes, because we haven't seen the final document yet. We'll make those guidelines public quickly and we will move to distribute them in every way we can, through small business associations, on our website, everywhere we can. We think in and of themselves they will provide a balance as to how we act in respect to Bill C-47. The more the public knows, the better chance we have of having no problems. Frankly, I think we've tried to take the position that most organizations don't really want to take advantage. In many cases, it's inadvertence or simply a mistake.
On the harm, as I think it was answered earlier—and I'll have my colleague speak to it a little—I think the concern we have is the time. It's being in a situation where we have no other way to remedy. The games are coming quickly; we're in a very narrow window, and we have no way. This is why it's designed this way. I think other countries have had that experience, where time is not your friend sometimes. I think if we were here for 20 or 30 years, it would be different, but we aren't. We need to be able to take action quickly.
We have given our word to many organizations. We're concerned that someone who has not acquired these rights or been given these rights, and they've been given to someone else, and that someone else is protected—that we live up to our commitment to them. We need to be able to do that.
Do you want to comment further on that?