I think it's more complicated than that. For instance, in terms of granting councils and academic support, we talked about quality and supporting the best, and that means the best proposals irrespective of location. Some of that will benefit the immediate location and help build a cluster of innovation—for instance, the bio-farm industry in Montreal.
But at the same time, there may be outstanding proposals from individuals out in Vancouver that could still benefit that area. For example, look at the development of QLT from research of a biochemist and chemist at UBC that led to the creation of that firm.
It's only when you build clusters, when you have a high critical mass in a certain area of research, be it bio-farm, ICT, energy--the four priority areas we talked about. Then the investments, clustered in a particular location, do reap a harvest of results--as Michael Porter would say.
Nevertheless, you can diversify your investment cross-country and impact regions such as Prince Edward Island in certain areas.