I would imagine that someone making one mistake or a corporation making one mistake would probably not trigger a $100 million fine, and I guess this is a question and a statement at the same time. A repeat offender would be the person you would charge, not somebody who does just the one-off. Is that how I'm to read this? Is that correct? I'm trying to put myself in the shoes of the person who's regulating this.
On October 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.