There has been some talk about the broadness of the bill, and I understand where people are going, that maybe there are risks of having a bill that's too broad. I'm not convinced, in terms of the opt-in and opt-out arguments, but there are measures within the bill to make changes using the regulations, am I correct? If there's an area that someone looks at and says, “You know what, that's not quite the effect we meant to have”, can there be changes made through regulation so as to not have to come back to the House of Commons and through this process again?
On October 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.