My first point is there is nothing in the proposed act that would force the Competition Bureau to investigate something that would seem more like a mistake or an oversight in the header of an e-mail.
Secondly, it would increase the burden on the Competition Bureau to have to prove the materiality of the information described in the header information. And as is the case with most everything in the act, there is a due diligence defence on the civil side for these violations, and if you bring frivolous cases forward, as it is in the Canadian legal system, you run the risk of having to pay for the legal fees and the costs of the defendant. So we don't see this as a problem. We don't see it as an issue. So in our view this is somewhat frivolous.