The provision is not a doubling-up. The clause essentially functions the same way that it did as introduced. We consider the amendments to be technical rather than of a policy nature. The private right of action in this case for violations of PIPEDA and the Competition Act are all in clause 50. That is the reason why, and it always was.
It is a bit more explicit now because we have actually looked at each of the dispositions and considered how to appropriately differentiate the various contraventions of reviewable conduct that is subject to the legislation, in order to clarify whether the cap of $200 applies to a simple e-mail or whether an e-mail that contains misrepresentations would presumably be treated the same way.