You're not reading it incorrectly. But the amendment has nothing to do with that. The amendment does not change the underlying provisions of either the Competition Act or ECPA. It simply clarifies what was perhaps not initially obvious. We were concerned to make it clear, both for the purposes of persons who have to comply with the act and for people who have to adjudicate under the act, that the appropriate remedies be available for similar types of harms or civil wrongs, if you will. That's all we've done. We haven't changed in any measure the aggregate amounts or the minimum amounts at all. We've just attempted to better differentiate where those appropriately apply.
On October 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.