I can't speak for Interac; I can only assume that they would like us not to intervene. If we were to intervene, they would feel that we'd done our homework and that we could be a significant factor before the tribunal. So they want to try to convince us that there will be no harm in making the changes they would like. If we don't intervene and oppose the transactions, the tribunal would likely decide in their favour.
On November 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.