I'm not 100% familiar with the SIRIUS situation, but I think the very important distinction between what Telesat does and what SIRIUS does is exactly the point that Mr. Bureau raised earlier about the difference between a BDU and something like Telesat, which is not a BDU and owns just a pipe.
SIRIUS, unlike Telesat, actually does make programming decisions, I believe. They do select the content that is carried on their satellite system. That's not what Telesat does at all. We lease our capacity to BDUs, to broadcasters, who then themselves make the decision about what kind of programming goes on the satellite. So today, we don't make decisions about what is carried on our satellite. In the future, we won't be making decisions about what's carried on our satellites.
With respect to safeguards, I think they're exactly the kinds of safeguards that Mr. Bureau referred to. Section 28.2 of the Telecommunications Act does give the CRTC very broad authority to claw back our satellite capacity, make it available to other Canadian users, if it deems that it's in the public interest.
I would say that in addition to the broad rights the CRTC has under the Telecommunications Act, Industry Canada has licence conditions, so every one of our satellites is licensed by Industry Canada. They have very specific and very exacting conditions that we're required to meet. So I'd say there are those two safeguards—one administered by Industry Canada, the other administered by the CRTC—and again, fundamentally, I think that SIRIUS, even though they're also in the satellite industry, is in a very different situation, because unlike Telesat, they act as a programmer as well, and it's simply not what we do.