You don't have to comment whether it's fair or not, but from a legislative point of view, we could.... If the committee decides this is what they want left in this bill, would it be reasonable to say we changed the wording to confirm it's the minimum as per the provincial legislation, so that somebody doesn't negotiate a $300,000 severance package, and then that's coming out of the system?
I'm a little nervous that they're ahead of the people who have been working there, and they're only guaranteed $2,000. I'm not necessarily in favour of this, but if the committee decides if they want to go this route, maybe it should be “up to the minimum, by the provincial standards”.
If that wording went in there, would that work?