I think if there are concerns.... For example, our analysis of 540 mergers and acquisitions between 1994 and 2007 found that the average premium paid to shareholders was 28%. This was the case of the surge in the resource sector that brought in an extra $50 billion or so to Canadian investors. You can track, and we do track, things like the shareholder return. We can also look at some aspects of the operational footprint and so on.
I think the concerns that come out—when you hear a discussion about champions and the broader impacts—are people thinking: what is it doing to our communities? Is it affecting our donations? Is it affecting the capacity of the region to support our schools and colleges, etc.?
I think if we have a typology that says we're looking at covering all the financial benefit, but going beyond that, it would give a level of confidence. People are saying there's a more holistic approach to this.