I agree. To go back to the fact that we do have examples elsewhere, we have high-risk industries that exist already. The nuclear industry is one of them, but there's also finance.
I disagree slightly with Mr. Gagné, because to the extent that the Americans are doing something, they have the force to insist. That is the importance of being a player at the international table with an advocate in the form of a commissioner who is truly independent and able to make decisions. Then you can make sure you're on side with everything. I do believe that at the end of the day international co-operation is essential, but I agree that looking for dangers ahead of time before they're launched on the market should be the case. We insist on that already for other things, in product safety and in other things, so to me it's not new. We have to adapt it to AI.
The other thing I would add that is important, because sometimes this comes out, is, oh, we can't force companies to share this sensitive information, because there's a competitive dynamic. But government departments handle confidential information all the time. That's what they do. The Commissioner of Competition does this all the time. Yes, of course there is a risk that it gets leaked or whatever, but I don't think that's any higher than other risks. I think sometimes that's overstated. Government regulators can handle sensitive information and can use it in the public interest. That's why we trust them to do it, I would say.