If we remove the expression “best practices”, that imposes a tremendous obligation on businesses. The fact that the commissioner can determine, among other things, that a person has been wronged and should not have been identified gives him—and I think this is Mr. Masse's intention—substantial power. It's a very important protection.
In the current version of Bill C‑27, it says that generally accepted practices would be determined de facto by the private sector. Mr. Turnbull's amendment proposes a compromise between the two.
What I'm trying to get at, then, is whether the proposed subamendment to G‑2 gives the government an opportunity to shirk its obligation to regulate properly.
Do you understand my question?