Mr. Chair, I have a very quick point.
It sounds like what I moved.... Actually, I didn't move it, because I wasn't able to. The subamendment that I was planning to move is now deemed another amendment, after we dispense with CPC-3. Essentially, there were brackets under (b), which was “it is pursuant to a reasonable law (other than section 44)”, and this could be changed to “other than section 33, 43 or 44 or subsection 47(1)”. Essentially, that would remove these self-referential loops within the bill and, for greater certainty, as some say, might make it a bit clearer and accommodate the suggestions that my Conservatives colleagues are making. It might be a way we could get this resolved.
Would that have any impact on the overall intention of what I had originally proposed when I planned to move it as a subamendment? No. Okay, great.
Why don't we do that? I'll agree to do that if we can dispense with CPC-3, and I will introduce exactly that.