Okay, maybe I'll go to Mr. Cannavino.
The old approach, in Bill C-70, had a way by which the sitting judge was told, for instance, you can't do a serious personal injury offence. But there was another clause that said, if there were exceptional circumstances and you provided written reasons to those exceptional circumstances.....
Here, we are put in a closed box. That's the current system. If you're in this catchment area, there's supposedly never any situation where you should be a little bit outside--you know, that unusual situation. That approach did give that, but the presumption was, here's where you're supposed to go unless you can prove that you're in an exceptional circumstance.
I'd like to hear your input on that, because frankly that's what we're going to be up against, and if you think there are some situations where that could happen.
Maybe Mr. Griffin could reply as well.