Yes. The amendments I would propose to Ms. Jennings and Mr. Ménard.... Specifically I'm looking at Ms. Jennings' amendment. Mr. Ménard said he was fine with Ms. Jennings' amendment, so I'm looking at her amendment.
The amendments I would make would be to take out the preamble, because I think it's too torqued, and to take out point 1, "that the Government postpone the reform made to the composition", because the changes that have been made to the composition have already been made. So I would take out point 1.
Points 2, 3, and 4 I would leave in place, except to change the “minimum of three” to a “minimum of two”, and to take out the words "the integrity of" in number 3.
So we would have a study of the judicial advisory committees, which I think is what Mr. Ménard is in favour of, but I would take out the language that I think would indicate the committee had somehow already drawn a conclusion.