If I can rephrase my question to the folks from the Police Association, the perspective I'm coming from is obviously that it's tampering with evidence. The evidence is the sample.
Now, I know there are provisions in the Criminal Code that provide for tampering with evidence. Are they applied? Are those provisions for tampering with evidence sufficient in this case? Or do changes need to be made to the Criminal Code when it comes to evidence such as breath samples and so on so that we can close off some of these loopholes?