I'll comment on that.
On the reverse onus provision for bail, which you brought in last year, most of the time crown prosecutors will not even argue it. They will not even ask for it, as they feel that it's not strong enough. And when they do, the judges never buy the argument anyway. It's completely useless.
There's frustration. I think the judges who want to apply it feel that, whatever the wording is, however it's been written.... I know that our Solicitor General in British Columbia said that he wants to see the reverse onus extended to a broader range of offences than gun-related and gang-related offences. I can tell you that just before I left, I spoke with a police inspector in the city of Vancouver, and he said that most times the prosecutors will not even bother trying to apply reverse onus. They don't feel that they could make a sufficient argument to a judge.
I don't know what the solution is.