I have a point of order. I would like to hear the opinion of the clerk or legislative clerk.
In terms of the amendments we just passed… If these are technical, as opposed to substantive amendments, because of the problem with the translation, I imagine there is no need to refer this back to the Senate. That is what I am seeking your opinion on. I'm sure there have been rulings in the past dealing with similar cases.
Are we required to refer this back to the Senate? It's not a substantive amendment; it only deals with a mistranslation. It doesn't even affect the interpretation.