It's kind of a question. I certainly intend to support the motion, but upon reading it, I'm assuming that within this amended subsection there's ample ability of the chief justice or designate to access the kind of information necessary to locate a victim described here. I'm assuming they would find the means to do it.
And second, I'm assuming that in the case of a 25-year parole ineligibility period there would be two notifications: one following the 15-year window and one following the 20-year window. Then after 25 years, when an inmate could apply for parole any time, there wouldn't be an actual “faint hope” application. It would just be a parole application after 25 years. Is that a fair assessment of the impact of this?