In other words, from your point of view, judicial discretion is something that should be the way we measure sentencing, not minimums or maximums set by Parliament.
Is that where you're coming from?
On May 29th, 2012. See this statement in context.
May 29th, 2012 / 12:20 p.m.
Conservative
Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative Delta—Richmond East, BC
In other words, from your point of view, judicial discretion is something that should be the way we measure sentencing, not minimums or maximums set by Parliament.
Is that where you're coming from?
See context to find out what was said next.