Ultimately, the discretion about how broad and narrow the Supreme Court seems to be saying is within the purview of Parliament. We're supportive of Parliament taking a narrow and focused, and as least over broad definition as possible when it comes to criminal law.
I don't think, for all practical purposes, it makes very much of a difference. If the law was left more broadly, as the Supreme Court says it could be, I quite frankly don't think it's going to make that much of a difference.