I've never been a member of a police force and I can't speak to institutional policies. It would perhaps be useful for the committee to have information about how these things are normally done. But from the cases I've seen, and from my view of the legislation, which is very extraordinary legislation, the additional oversight of specifying that a supervisor or senior officer is the one to make the decisions, for all practical purposes, that is probably what's going to happen. However, an amendment of that nature would not, at least from my read and my view of the police force, unduly lengthen or hamper the process or undercut the goals of section 184.4.
We see this in other areas of criminal law in which certain officers are designated as operators of breathalyzer machines and intoxalyzers. When dealing with extraordinary powers like this, that additional level of oversight may provide some assurances that it's being used properly and appropriately.