I didn't mean it that way, but anyway....
Madame Boivin did mention the fact that we are being asked to present amendments before we actually listen to all the witnesses, but in this case, it was really specific. If you remember what the vice-president of the Winnipeg Police Association said, he said that if we start somewhere, at least it's a start, in the sense that if we don't go forward with this amendment because we say that there are other places we should put in here.... Again, he has mentioned that the criminals will go elsewhere, but I think this is a clear indication that it's where we should start.
I think Mr. Goguen did mention that he wants to have more research. If you look at the brief that the justice minister from Manitoba presented to the committee, you'll see that it is a very extensive brief. There's a lot of information, and there has been a lot of consultation, and that is specifically a requirement. It mentions schools, community centres, or clubs. That is one of the recommendations. I think a lot of work has been done by our witnesses. From what we've heard from people on the ground, I think this is the type of amendment that we should definitely support, because it would help on the ground.
I agree with Mr. Goguen in terms of timing and in terms of needing to do more research, but if you look at our schedule, having to vote on clause-by-clause right after listening to witnesses on a specific bill, I think that's where we have to react.