Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I appreciate the testimony we've heard both from the previous panel and from those here now. This is a topic on which, as Ms. Dann pointed out, legislators need to take into consideration many different views and have panels reflecting a wide diversity of ideas and thoughts. I appreciate your testimony.
Ms. Dann, you mentioned that there are a number of issues. From your association's viewpoint, funding is an issue for other priorities. As Ms. Pate has pointed out, many of them are provincial. There is a tension between federal and provincial responsibilities.
As a legislator, I can't pretend to know what resources the Province of Ontario devotes to it, because I'm not in that particular area. From what I've seen, based on this piece of legislation, this is really the area in which as legislators.... We can only tackle what's in front of us.
I imagine that a judge would have the same kind of issues. It's my understanding that it's the judge who would actually give the designation “NCR”.
Is that correct, Ms. Dann?