Yes. I do have the NDP-1 subamendment before us.
Our initial reaction would probably be as follows. We understand that the reference to any conditions of release is intended to be generic and not get into the detailed approach. That's understood.
That does still raise some concerns that the committee should take into account. For example, this may still get into whether there are some privacy implications. If it's a review board issue, then it would be subject to privacy legislation at play in the provinces and territories.
There would also be concern that I think would be quite significant to take into account, which is what this additional burden would add to the workload of the review boards. Bear in mind that you heard from chairs of the boards, which were amongst the larger ones. There are smaller ones in the country with less resources to discharge whatever additional responsibilities you might be looking to support here.
Those would be some of the preliminary reactions we would have that the committee could take into account, if you're looking at this at this moment.