Well, Chair, what the Supreme Court ultimately spoke about was the overbreadth and gross disproportionality of the law. Let's not forget that the case did previously go through trial division and appeal court division, where it was overturned, and then the Supreme Court came back with its decision.
But the objective here is to denounce and deter prostitution as a practice. We are informed by the Bedford decision from the Supreme Court, but other sources as well. We see it as a practice that commodifies, degrades, and dehumanizes, and it exploits people who are involved in prostitution. As a result, we've responded with a bill that we think asserts that prostitutes are victims of an inherently dangerous and exploitative practice.