That is correct. There are two components to our programs.
If there is a pull in that sense, an indication of an interest, and we work with the provinces, the provinces have...and we have had people in the field visiting communities, talking about these programs, trying to raise awareness.
If there's an interest and not the capacity, where they don't have experience doing it, a limited investment can be made in helping them build that capacity so they can have an aboriginal justice worker or whatever and start a program.
In my experience, as well, often you will find people who are tremendous leaders in their own community, who are very entrepreneurial. If we could harness the energy they bring to try to define government programming, involvement of community members, and otherwise, in that sense it's very much a pull program of saying that we want this, we'll do the application, we'll build the program, and we'll sustain it through thick and thin, notwithstanding what's happening in our communities.
It isn't a per capita transfer. It wouldn't be an effective per capita transfer, because it really does rest on kind of the courage and the leadership of the people in the communities who are willing to do the day-in day-out grind work of getting those diversion programs running and sustaining them, doing the follow-up with the offenders who are in those programs, and otherwise.
It is very much not a per capita program.