Here's the follow-up question then. Don't you have an obligation to know? Doesn't the government when making law.... Even if it's criminal law, you can put it in the code, but there's a social context for this law. In the absence of consultation, in the absence of that kind of social knowledge, and in the absence of knowledge about how this actual criminal activity works—and I know you can't know it in sufficient detail, or you probably would have put it out of business already—it seems to me that you are taking an enormous risk on the effectiveness of the law and the potential for a significant differential impact on certain constituencies in our society.
Perhaps it's as obvious as forcing police forces to start enforcing this law. You're putting crowns in provinces into a position where they have to deal with mandatory minimums, and how are they going to respond? I'm struck by how you make a law without taking all of that into consideration, because I don't know how you can know the effectiveness of that law in the absence of that consideration and knowledge.