I don't disagree with you, Mr. Lutes. Unfortunately, I think perhaps the position might be overnuanced and overanalyzed legally, to be honest, because I don't think there's a scenario where a court is going to hold you responsible for breaking up a fight and protecting one student from two other students or one other student. I don't think the repeal of section 43 would create that exposure. I think you would still be allowed to do your job in the same way you are now. Section 43, as we've heard time and time again, was introduced at a time and place.... It is entirely different now. It's entirely different from what it was prior to the Supreme Court of Canada's decision.
I want to move over to you, Dr. Kelly. Let's assume that section 43 is repealed, and let's assume that a teacher is charged with an offence, as they could be now because I don't think students, teachers or parents know that section 43 exists until they hire a lawyer in a particular situation. Do you not think that the Supreme Court of Canada, as they laid out in their decision, would still provide guidance to courts in analyzing a particular set of facts when a teacher is put in a position where he has to defend himself against an assault charge?