That's just as we were not responding to Dr. Roebuck's and Professor Benedet's concerns in the previous study.
My first question was why there was a difference in wording between proposed paragraphs 264.01(2)(a) and 264.01(2)(b), and proposed paragraph 264.01(2)(c)—the “could reasonably be expected to” wording. Why not have it in all three paragraphs?