Well, that's true, but we are moving more to a global market in LNG. As more infrastructure is in place, we can expect to see more reference to a global price, and that will definitely be higher.
One of the arguments, part of the debate in the U.S. at the moment, is the impact of exports on domestic prices. The other side of this is that if we were to open up our market entirely to the world for natural gas, then we can assume that we would pay world prices in Canada for our natural gas, less the cost of moving it to those other markets. That may be of concern to a SAGD oil and gas oil sands operator who doesn't have a captive supply. That's going to drive up the cost of new projects, and I would be concerned about that, quite frankly.
The debate in the U.S. has been sort of two-sided. One is the likes of Dow Chemicals, which is concerned about the cost of its feedstocks if too much gas is exported, and the other side of it is the shale gas operators who are looking to get more value out of their product, who want to have more exports. You want to decide whether to export jobs out of the U.S. or keep them at home. That's the debate going on right now in the U.S.