Evidence of meeting #1 for Public Safety and National Security in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clerk.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Roger Préfontaine

3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Serge Ménard Bloc Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

I think that we can indeed continue to proceed as we did during the previous session. However, I think that at some point, with unanimous consent, we could entrust a complicated question precisely to the type of subcommittee you were suggesting. If we feel that a question merits in-depth discussion but do not have enough time to examine it ourselves, we could certainly strike a temporary subcommittee. That is why I would be in agreement with the chairman's suggestion that we keep the same rule as during the previous session.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Garry Breitkreuz

Thank you, Monsieur Ménard.

Did somebody else have their hand up?

Mr. Cullen.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Roy Cullen Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

Mr. Chair, in the last session we dealt with things in the committee as a whole, and I think it worked well. In fact, I don't recall a steering committee meeting. If there was one, I obviously missed it.

The problem is that if you leave it in, when does it meet and when does it not meet? If you don't have any subcommittee, then it's clear. If the chair wants to bring people in to discuss some feature or proposal, the chair can do that. Once you leave it in, it is in never-never land as to when the committee meets and on what issues.

I don't think we need one. We didn't have one in the past. We might have had one formally, but informally I don't think we ever used it.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Garry Breitkreuz

Ms. Priddy.

3:50 p.m.

NDP

Penny Priddy NDP Surrey North, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

To the member, I just wonder if there is a rationale you can give to me very quickly, in 30 seconds, for why you've brought this forward.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

All I know is that it's being put before all the committees, and I think it simply quantifies some of these things to try to make for consistency amongst committees.

3:50 p.m.

NDP

Penny Priddy NDP Surrey North, BC

Thank you.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

And at the end of the day, I'm certain that each committee will make its own rules.

But I think that was the intent.

3:50 p.m.

NDP

Penny Priddy NDP Surrey North, BC

Right. Thank you.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Garry Breitkreuz

Mr. Cullen.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Roy Cullen Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

Just to make another brief comment—and nothing of this is against Dave and the parliamentary secretary—I've been a parliamentary secretary and know that in some committees there's an objection to having the parliamentary secretary on the steering committee, because they're privy to a lot of information. The feeling is they could try to drive the agenda in a certain way the committee members as a whole may not appreciate. I know I've been excluded in the past from steering committees when I was a parliamentary secretary. So I just think it's that way.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

Maybe you were partisan.

3:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Garry Breitkreuz

Okay, we won't comment on your past experiences. But on this committee we've often included the parliamentary secretary because he had insights as to what legislation would be coming down—approximately when—and it helped the committee to decide. That's why he was part of the committee that decided.

Go ahead.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

If we move to the next one on the reduced quorum, I think the addition there was to add that at least one member of the government be present, but also to limit the time that the committee had to wait for the meeting to be able to move ahead—because I don't think we've ever had that time in there. So for those people....

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Sue Barnes Liberal London West, ON

But why is it outside the parliamentary precinct?

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

Because I think we're going to be moving the committee.

Perhaps the clerk can tell us, but I think we're going to be moving to different places, aren't we?

3:50 p.m.

The Clerk

Not to my knowledge.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

No?

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Sue Barnes Liberal London West, ON

I don't think we should be meeting outside the parliamentary precinct unless we have an order to travel.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

I thought we were going back to 131 Queen Street, as we'd heard.

3:50 p.m.

The Clerk

That's a new building, but it's considered part of the parliamentary precinct, sir, for the purposes of committee meetings.

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Roy Cullen Liberal Etobicoke North, ON

What if we had any consultations and we travelled? Is that what you're meaning?

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Garry Breitkreuz

Yes, I think it would apply to that.

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Dave MacKenzie Conservative Oxford, ON

And that might very well be.