It sounds as though the background check process is quite prescribed now. It doesn't seem to have a lot of flexibility.
I'm wondering also about the portfolio aspect. I mean, there are some portfolios within the government where national security risks could be more of an issue. So let's say you're looking at the Minister of National Defence, and the minister's spouse or significant other had known connections to the underworld or to terrorist groups; and when I say “known”, I mean they may not have been arrested but they were persons of interest that you were tracking. You didn't have enough evidence, let's say, but you were pretty sure they were terrorists or criminal people.
So the fact that it was a Minister of National Defence would have no bearing on that. If it were the Minister of Veterans Affairs, there'd be no differentiation made. Is that correct?