It forms part of our recommendations on oversight of the RCMP as a whole. We have recommended stronger oversight of the RCMP's activities in general. So while we're satisfied that there has been good, sound management—my colleague is part of an oversight committee that's comprised of academics, jurists, and law enforcement who oversee the management of the data bank—we would advocate for continued sound management. If part of that meant separating it, so that there could be some separation from the investigative arm versus the arm that manages the data bank, that could only be a good thing, in our view, although to date we have been pleased with the way that samples are kept separate from identifiers and with the good, strong oversight.
Does that answer your question?